MicroIQ · AP Microeconomics · Lesson 15 of 15
MicroIQ · AP Microeconomics

Lesson 15: Government, Income Distribution & Exam Strategy

Unit 6 · Phase 5

Objectives

Warm-Up

Two countries have identical average incomes. In one, most households cluster near the average; in the other, a thin slice holds most of the income. Same average, radically different economies. Measuring that difference is Unit 6's last job — and then this lesson turns to the only topic left: how to convert fifteen lessons of microeconomics into the highest AP score you can produce in 2 hours and 10 minutes.


Core Concept

The Lorenz curve

The Lorenz curve plots the cumulative percentage of income (y-axis) received by the cumulative percentage of households (x-axis), poorest first.

[GRAPH: Lorenz curve. X-axis: "Cumulative % of households (poorest → richest)" 0–100. Y-axis: "Cumulative % of income" 0–100. A 45° diagonal labeled "line of perfect equality". A bowed-below curve labeled "Lorenz curve": e.g., poorest 20% receive 5% of income, poorest 60% receive 30%, poorest 80% receive 55%. Area between diagonal and curve labeled "A"; area under Lorenz curve labeled "B".]

The Gini coefficient

Gini = A / (A + B) — the bowed-out area as a share of the whole triangle.

Sources of income differences: human capital and education, ability, discrimination, market power, inheritance/wealth, luck, and factor-market outcomes (Lesson 13 — wages = MRP means productivity differences become income differences).

Tax structures

Classify by what happens to the average tax rate (ATR = taxes paid ÷ income) as income rises:

Structure ATR as income ↑ Example
Progressive Rises U.S. federal income tax (higher brackets)
Proportional (flat) Constant A uniform 15% income tax
Regressive Falls Sales taxes, excise taxes (the poor spend — and are taxed on — a larger share of income)

Antitrust & the government toolkit (course wrap)

The full government menu you've assembled across the course: - Price controls (L5): ceilings/floors — cause shortages/surpluses and DWL in competitive markets - Taxes/subsidies (L5, L14): shift curves; optimal Pigouvian size = the externality - Regulation of natural monopoly (L11): fair-return P = ATC vs. socially optimal P = MC - Antitrust law (Sherman/Clayton tradition): blocking collusion (L12's cartels are illegal in the U.S.), reviewing mergers, breaking up or restraining monopolies that aren't natural - Public provision (L14): public goods financed by taxes - Redistribution (this lesson): progressive taxation and transfers


PART II: THE COMPLETE EXAM PLAYBOOK

Format and timing

Section Questions Time Weight Pace
I: Multiple choice 60 (5 choices) 70 min 66.7% ~70 sec/question
II: Free response 1 long + 2 short 60 min (incl. 10-min reading) 33.3% Long ≈ 25 min; shorts ≈ 12–13 min each

No penalty for wrong answers — answer all 60. A four-function calculator is allowed; every computation is hand-doable.

MC strategy

  1. Two passes. Bank the easy ~40 first; mark and return to the rest. Never let one graph puzzle eat four questions' time.
  2. Draw tiny graphs. For any shift question, a 3-second sketch in the margin beats mental rotation — the #1 self-inflicted error is flipping a shift direction.
  3. Kill distractors by category. Most wrong answers are one of: movement-vs-shift confusion, price-from-MR instead of demand, absolute-vs-comparative advantage, raw-MU instead of MU-per-dollar, accounting-vs-economic profit.
  4. Indeterminate is an answer. Double-shift questions usually include it, and it's usually right for one variable.

FRQ strategy

  1. Use the 10-minute reading period on the long FRQ. Sketch its graph skeleton mentally; identify which model each part wants.
  2. Label everything. Axes, curves, equilibrium points, dashed lines to axes. Points are awarded per label — an unlabeled correct curve scores zero.
  3. Answer-then-explain. "Price rises (1 sentence: because demand increased while supply was constant)." State the direction FIRST, then justify. Graders hunt for the assertion + the because.
  4. Show the chain: rule → numbers → conclusion. "Hire where MRP = MFC; MRP(4) = $70 = W; hire 4 workers."
  5. Don't abandon parts. Later parts often don't depend on earlier ones. Attempt everything.

The master graph checklist (draw each from memory before exam day)

  1. PPC — bowed, with efficient/inefficient/unattainable points (L1)
  2. Supply & demand: 4 single shifts + 4 double shifts (L3)
  3. Surplus areas: CS, PS at equilibrium (L5)
  4. Price ceiling (shortage) and floor (surplus) with DWL (L5)
  5. Per-unit tax: wedge, incidence rectangles, revenue, DWL (L5)
  6. Cost family: MC through minimums of AVC & ATC; AFC falling (L7)
  7. LRATC with scale regions and MES (L8)
  8. Side-by-side perfect competition: profit, loss, shutdown, long-run (L9) ★
  9. Monopoly: profit, DWL, efficient point (L10) ★
  10. Perfect price discrimination (L11)
  11. Natural monopoly: unregulated / fair-return / socially optimal (L11)
  12. Monopolistic competition: short-run profit and long-run tangency (L12)
  13. Payoff matrix protocol (not a graph — a ritual) (L12)
  14. Side-by-side labor market; monopsony (L13)
  15. Negative externality (MSC above MPC); positive externality (MSB above MPB) (L14)
  16. Lorenz curve (L15)

★ = highest historical FRQ frequency. If you can draw all sixteen cold, you are structurally unable to fail the graphing points.

The five commandments (course-level errors that outrank all others)

  1. Price comes from the demand curve (never MR/MC) — and wage from the supply curve under monopsony.
  2. MR = MC / MRP = MFC picks quantity; comparing P to ATC picks profit. Two separate steps, always.
  3. Movement along vs. shift — own price moves along; everything else shifts.
  4. Compare per-dollar (MU/P, MP/$), never raw marginals across different prices.
  5. Zero economic profit is normal — it's where free entry finishes its work.

Worked Examples

Example 1 (easy): Reading a Lorenz curve

In Country Q, the poorest 40% of households receive 12% of income; the poorest 80% receive 50%. In Country R, the corresponding figures are 25% and 65%. Which country has the higher Gini coefficient?

Solution: Q's Lorenz curve lies farther below the diagonal at every point (12 < 25, 50 < 65) → more inequality → Q has the higher Gini.

Interpretation: Farther bow = bigger area A = higher Gini. No integration required — comparison suffices.

Example 2 (medium): Classify the tax

A country taxes all grocery purchases at 8%. A household earning $20,000 spends $8,000 on groceries; a household earning $200,000 spends $20,000. Classify this tax with respect to income.

Solution: Tax paid: $640 vs. $1,600. ATR: 640/20,000 = 3.2% vs. 1,600/200,000 = 0.8%. ATR falls as income rises → regressive, despite the flat 8% rate on purchases.

Interpretation: Always compute tax ÷ income. Flat-on-spending ≠ proportional-on-income.

Example 3 (AP-style): Synthesis sprint

One-line answers, mixing the whole course: (i) A firm's MR = MC output has P < AVC — output? (ii) Payoff matrix shows no player can improve unilaterally at (Low, Low) — what is this cell? (iii) A subsidy for solar panels corrects what? (iv) In long-run monopolistic competition, why is P = ATC but > min ATC?

Solution: (i) Zero — shut down. (ii) Nash equilibrium. (iii) A positive externality (MSB > MPB → underproduction). (iv) Free entry forces tangency (zero profit) but tangency on a downward demand curve must occur left of ATC's minimum — excess capacity.

Interpretation: The exam mixes units within single questions; your recall must be structured by model, not by lesson number.


Common Mistakes

  1. Putting income on the wrong Lorenz axis. Households (cumulative %) on X, income (cumulative %) on Y — the poorest-first ordering is what makes the curve bow below.
  2. Calling a flat sales tax "proportional." Test against income, not against the tax base. Spending share falls as income rises → regressive.
  3. Confusing marginal and average tax rates. A 37% top marginal bracket does not mean 37% of total income is taxed.
  4. Exam-day: leaving graphs unlabeled. The rubric pays per label. Sixty seconds of labeling is the best-paid minute of your year.
  5. Spending 25 minutes on a short FRQ. The long FRQ carries roughly double weight — protect its time first.

Practice Problems

Question 1
The Lorenz curve plots:
Question 2
If income were perfectly equally distributed, the Gini coefficient would be:
Question 3
A tax system in which the average tax rate rises with income is:
Question 4
A $2-per-pack cigarette excise tax is generally considered regressive because:
Question 5
Government action A moves the Lorenz curve closer to the 45° line. Action A is most likely:
Question 6
Effective antitrust enforcement against a colluding oligopoly is intended to move the market outcome:
Question 7
In Country M, the poorest 60% of households earn 20% of income. In Country N, the poorest 60% earn 35%. Which statement is correct?
Question 8
Wages in competitive labor markets equal MRP. This connects income inequality most directly to differences in:

9. (FRQ-style) Country Z's income distribution: poorest 20% → 4% of income; next 20% → 8%; middle 20% → 15%; fourth 20% → 23%; richest 20% → 50%. (a) Compute the cumulative income shares at 20/40/60/80/100% of households. (b) Draw a correctly labeled Lorenz curve for Country Z, including the line of perfect equality. (c) Country Z replaces a flat sales tax with a progressive income tax funding cash transfers to the bottom two quintiles. Show/describe the effect on your Lorenz curve and state what happens to the Gini coefficient. (d) Identify one possible efficiency cost of the new policy.


Show answer key & explanations

(g) Answer Key

1. (B) Definition. Cumulative households (poorest first) vs. cumulative income.

2. (C) Lorenz = diagonal → area A = 0 → Gini = 0.

3. (C) Rising ATR defines progressive.

4. (E) Low-income smokers pay a far larger share of income; ATR falls with income.

5. (A) Progressive tax + transfers compresses the distribution → curve toward the diagonal, Gini ↓. (B) and (D) push the other way.

6. (B) Breaking collusion moves the industry from the cartel (monopoly-like) outcome toward the competitive one: P ↓, Q ↑, DWL ↓.

7. (D) 20% < 35% at the same population point → M bows farther → M's Gini higher. (B) reverses it.

8. (B) W = MRP = MP × P: productivity and product prices translate directly into wage differences.

9. (FRQ rubric, 7 points) - (a) 1 pt: Cumulative: 4%, 12%, 27%, 50%, 100%. - (b) 3 pts: Axes labeled cumulative % households / cumulative % income, 0–100 (1); 45° equality line (1); Lorenz curve through (20,4), (40,12), (60,27), (80,50), (100,100), bowed below the diagonal (1). - (c) 2 pts: Lorenz curve shifts toward the diagonal (1); Gini falls (1). - (d) 1 pt: Any one: higher marginal rates may reduce work/investment incentives; taxes create deadweight loss; administrative costs; transfers may reduce labor supply.


Exam tip — final: The night before, do exactly two things: redraw the sixteen graphs from the checklist, and reread the five commandments. On exam morning, remember that every question on the paper is one of the models you have already drawn dozens of times. Trust the ritual: quantity first, then price, then areas. Go collect your 5.

← All lessons
Mock Exam 1 ›
Score: 0/0 correct