Two countries have identical average incomes. In one, most households cluster near the average; in the other, a thin slice holds most of the income. Same average, radically different economies. Measuring that difference is Unit 6's last job — and then this lesson turns to the only topic left: how to convert fifteen lessons of microeconomics into the highest AP score you can produce in 2 hours and 10 minutes.
The Lorenz curve plots the cumulative percentage of income (y-axis) received by the cumulative percentage of households (x-axis), poorest first.
[GRAPH: Lorenz curve. X-axis: "Cumulative % of households (poorest → richest)" 0–100. Y-axis: "Cumulative % of income" 0–100. A 45° diagonal labeled "line of perfect equality". A bowed-below curve labeled "Lorenz curve": e.g., poorest 20% receive 5% of income, poorest 60% receive 30%, poorest 80% receive 55%. Area between diagonal and curve labeled "A"; area under Lorenz curve labeled "B".]
Gini = A / (A + B) — the bowed-out area as a share of the whole triangle.
Sources of income differences: human capital and education, ability, discrimination, market power, inheritance/wealth, luck, and factor-market outcomes (Lesson 13 — wages = MRP means productivity differences become income differences).
Classify by what happens to the average tax rate (ATR = taxes paid ÷ income) as income rises:
| Structure | ATR as income ↑ | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Progressive | Rises | U.S. federal income tax (higher brackets) |
| Proportional (flat) | Constant | A uniform 15% income tax |
| Regressive | Falls | Sales taxes, excise taxes (the poor spend — and are taxed on — a larger share of income) |
The full government menu you've assembled across the course: - Price controls (L5): ceilings/floors — cause shortages/surpluses and DWL in competitive markets - Taxes/subsidies (L5, L14): shift curves; optimal Pigouvian size = the externality - Regulation of natural monopoly (L11): fair-return P = ATC vs. socially optimal P = MC - Antitrust law (Sherman/Clayton tradition): blocking collusion (L12's cartels are illegal in the U.S.), reviewing mergers, breaking up or restraining monopolies that aren't natural - Public provision (L14): public goods financed by taxes - Redistribution (this lesson): progressive taxation and transfers
| Section | Questions | Time | Weight | Pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I: Multiple choice | 60 (5 choices) | 70 min | 66.7% | ~70 sec/question |
| II: Free response | 1 long + 2 short | 60 min (incl. 10-min reading) | 33.3% | Long ≈ 25 min; shorts ≈ 12–13 min each |
No penalty for wrong answers — answer all 60. A four-function calculator is allowed; every computation is hand-doable.
★ = highest historical FRQ frequency. If you can draw all sixteen cold, you are structurally unable to fail the graphing points.
In Country Q, the poorest 40% of households receive 12% of income; the poorest 80% receive 50%. In Country R, the corresponding figures are 25% and 65%. Which country has the higher Gini coefficient?
Solution: Q's Lorenz curve lies farther below the diagonal at every point (12 < 25, 50 < 65) → more inequality → Q has the higher Gini.
Interpretation: Farther bow = bigger area A = higher Gini. No integration required — comparison suffices.
A country taxes all grocery purchases at 8%. A household earning $20,000 spends $8,000 on groceries; a household earning $200,000 spends $20,000. Classify this tax with respect to income.
Solution: Tax paid: $640 vs. $1,600. ATR: 640/20,000 = 3.2% vs. 1,600/200,000 = 0.8%. ATR falls as income rises → regressive, despite the flat 8% rate on purchases.
Interpretation: Always compute tax ÷ income. Flat-on-spending ≠ proportional-on-income.
One-line answers, mixing the whole course: (i) A firm's MR = MC output has P < AVC — output? (ii) Payoff matrix shows no player can improve unilaterally at (Low, Low) — what is this cell? (iii) A subsidy for solar panels corrects what? (iv) In long-run monopolistic competition, why is P = ATC but > min ATC?
Solution: (i) Zero — shut down. (ii) Nash equilibrium. (iii) A positive externality (MSB > MPB → underproduction). (iv) Free entry forces tangency (zero profit) but tangency on a downward demand curve must occur left of ATC's minimum — excess capacity.
Interpretation: The exam mixes units within single questions; your recall must be structured by model, not by lesson number.
1. (B) Definition. Cumulative households (poorest first) vs. cumulative income.
2. (C) Lorenz = diagonal → area A = 0 → Gini = 0.
3. (C) Rising ATR defines progressive.
4. (E) Low-income smokers pay a far larger share of income; ATR falls with income.
5. (A) Progressive tax + transfers compresses the distribution → curve toward the diagonal, Gini ↓. (B) and (D) push the other way.
6. (B) Breaking collusion moves the industry from the cartel (monopoly-like) outcome toward the competitive one: P ↓, Q ↑, DWL ↓.
7. (D) 20% < 35% at the same population point → M bows farther → M's Gini higher. (B) reverses it.
8. (B) W = MRP = MP × P: productivity and product prices translate directly into wage differences.
9. (FRQ rubric, 7 points) - (a) 1 pt: Cumulative: 4%, 12%, 27%, 50%, 100%. - (b) 3 pts: Axes labeled cumulative % households / cumulative % income, 0–100 (1); 45° equality line (1); Lorenz curve through (20,4), (40,12), (60,27), (80,50), (100,100), bowed below the diagonal (1). - (c) 2 pts: Lorenz curve shifts toward the diagonal (1); Gini falls (1). - (d) 1 pt: Any one: higher marginal rates may reduce work/investment incentives; taxes create deadweight loss; administrative costs; transfers may reduce labor supply.
9. (FRQ-style) Country Z's income distribution: poorest 20% → 4% of income; next 20% → 8%; middle 20% → 15%; fourth 20% → 23%; richest 20% → 50%. (a) Compute the cumulative income shares at 20/40/60/80/100% of households. (b) Draw a correctly labeled Lorenz curve for Country Z, including the line of perfect equality. (c) Country Z replaces a flat sales tax with a progressive income tax funding cash transfers to the bottom two quintiles. Show/describe the effect on your Lorenz curve and state what happens to the Gini coefficient. (d) Identify one possible efficiency cost of the new policy.
1. (B) Definition. Cumulative households (poorest first) vs. cumulative income.
2. (C) Lorenz = diagonal → area A = 0 → Gini = 0.
3. (C) Rising ATR defines progressive.
4. (E) Low-income smokers pay a far larger share of income; ATR falls with income.
5. (A) Progressive tax + transfers compresses the distribution → curve toward the diagonal, Gini ↓. (B) and (D) push the other way.
6. (B) Breaking collusion moves the industry from the cartel (monopoly-like) outcome toward the competitive one: P ↓, Q ↑, DWL ↓.
7. (D) 20% < 35% at the same population point → M bows farther → M's Gini higher. (B) reverses it.
8. (B) W = MRP = MP × P: productivity and product prices translate directly into wage differences.
9. (FRQ rubric, 7 points) - (a) 1 pt: Cumulative: 4%, 12%, 27%, 50%, 100%. - (b) 3 pts: Axes labeled cumulative % households / cumulative % income, 0–100 (1); 45° equality line (1); Lorenz curve through (20,4), (40,12), (60,27), (80,50), (100,100), bowed below the diagonal (1). - (c) 2 pts: Lorenz curve shifts toward the diagonal (1); Gini falls (1). - (d) 1 pt: Any one: higher marginal rates may reduce work/investment incentives; taxes create deadweight loss; administrative costs; transfers may reduce labor supply.
Exam tip — final: The night before, do exactly two things: redraw the sixteen graphs from the checklist, and reread the five commandments. On exam morning, remember that every question on the paper is one of the models you have already drawn dozens of times. Trust the ritual: quantity first, then price, then areas. Go collect your 5.