CLEP Biology · Lesson 12 of 15
CLEP Biology

Lesson 12: Population Genetics and Hardy-Weinberg


What You'll Learn

This lesson is squarely in the population-biology domain, about one-third of the CLEP exam. The math stays conceptual — you will square and multiply small decimals in your head. The bigger payoff is understanding what Hardy-Weinberg is a baseline for: it defines "no evolution" so that any deviation flags a mechanism at work.

Content

Gene pools and frequencies

A population's gene pool is all the alleles of all genes in that population. We describe it with frequencies: - Allele frequencies: for a gene with two alleles, we call them p and q, and p + q = 1. - Genotype frequencies: the proportions of each genotype (homozygous dominant, heterozygous, homozygous recessive).

The Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium

Hardy-Weinberg describes a non-evolving population — allele frequencies stay constant across generations. It holds only when all five conditions are met: 1. No mutation 2. No gene flow (no migration in or out) 3. Random mating 4. No natural selection 5. Very large population (no drift)

If these hold, genotype frequencies follow:

p² + 2pq + q² = 1

Term Genotype Meaning
Homozygous dominant frequency of the dominant homozygote
2pq Heterozygous frequency of carriers
Homozygous recessive frequency of the recessive homozygote

The point of the equilibrium is conceptual: it is the null model. If real frequencies drift away from these values, something — selection, drift, migration, mutation, or nonrandom mating — is driving evolution.

Simple allele-frequency reasoning

Two moves cover most CLEP items: - Given q, find p with p = 1 − q (since p + q = 1). - Square or multiply to get genotype proportions: for homozygous recessive, 2pq for heterozygotes.

Example: if q = 0.2, then p = 0.8; homozygous recessives = q² = 0.04; heterozygotes = 2pq = 2(0.8)(0.2) = 0.32.

Mechanisms of microevolution

Anything that breaks a Hardy-Weinberg condition can change allele frequencies:

Mechanism What it does
Mutation Introduces entirely new alleles (the ultimate source of variation)
Gene flow Movement of alleles between populations; tends to make them more similar
Genetic drift Random frequency change, strong in small populations
Nonrandom mating Alters genotype proportions (e.g., mate choice)

Two special cases of drift: - Bottleneck effect — a population is drastically reduced (often by a random catastrophe), and the survivors' allele frequencies differ from the original. - Founder effect — a few individuals start a new population, which reflects only those founders' alleles.

Sources of genetic variation

Key Takeaways

Practice Questions

Question 1
The gene pool of a population is best defined as
Question 2
In a population with only two alleles for a gene, the frequency of the recessive allele (q) is 0.3. What is the frequency of the dominant allele (p)?
Question 3
Which of the following must be true for a population to remain in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium?
Question 4
In a population at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the recessive allele frequency q is 0.2. What proportion of the population is expected to be homozygous recessive (q²)?
Question 5
In a population at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, p = 0.6 and q = 0.4. What proportion of individuals are expected to be heterozygous?
Question 6
If a population's allele frequencies do not change from one generation to the next, the most direct conclusion is that
Question 7
In a small population, allele frequencies shift substantially from one generation to the next purely by chance, with no consistent direction. This process is
Question 8
A volcanic eruption randomly kills most members of a population, leaving a small surviving group whose allele frequencies differ from the original population. This best illustrates the
Question 9
A few individuals leave a large mainland population and colonize a remote island, establishing a population whose allele frequencies reflect only those few colonists. This best illustrates the
Question 10
Ongoing migration of individuals between two neighboring populations, followed by interbreeding, tends to
Question 11
Which of the following changes allele frequencies specifically by introducing entirely new alleles into a population?
Question 12
In sexually reproducing organisms, which of the following contributes most to producing new combinations of existing alleles each generation?
Show answer key & explanations

Answer Key

1. D — All the alleles of all genes present in the population. Fix: The gene pool is the complete set of alleles available in a population. - A: Population size counts individuals, not alleles. - B: The gene pool includes recessive and dominant alleles alike. - C: Expressed traits are phenotypes, not the allele pool. - E: One individual's chromosome count is not the whole population's genetic pool. - Fix rule: Gene pool = every allele of every gene in the whole population.

2. C — 0.7. Fix: Since p + q = 1, p = 1 − 0.3 = 0.7. - A: 0.09 is q², a genotype frequency, not p. - B: 0.49 is p², not the allele frequency itself. - D: 0.3 repeats q instead of subtracting it from 1. - E: 0.91 is (1 − q²) and has no direct meaning here. - Fix rule: p = 1 − q; don't confuse an allele frequency with a squared genotype term.

3. B — No mutation, no gene flow, random mating, no selection, and a large population. Fix: All five conditions must hold for allele frequencies to stay constant. - A: Strong selection changes frequencies, breaking equilibrium. - C: Small populations experience drift, breaking equilibrium. - D: Nonrandom mating shifts genotype proportions, breaking equilibrium. - E: Frequent gene flow alters allele frequencies, breaking equilibrium. - Fix rule: Equilibrium = the "no-evolution" checklist of five conditions, all met.

4. A — 0.04. Fix: Homozygous recessive frequency is q² = 0.2 × 0.2 = 0.04. - B: 0.20 is q itself, not q². - C: 0.32 is 2pq (the heterozygotes), not q². - D: 0.16 comes from mistakenly squaring 0.4; with q = 0.2 the recessive homozygote is 0.2², not this value. - E: 0.64 is p² (0.8²), the homozygous dominant frequency. - Fix rule: Homozygous recessive = q²; square the recessive allele frequency.

5. D — 0.48. Fix: Heterozygote frequency is 2pq = 2 × 0.6 × 0.4 = 0.48. - A: 0.16 is q² (the homozygous recessives). - B: 0.36 is p² (the homozygous dominants). - C: 0.24 is pq, forgetting the factor of 2. - E: 0.60 simply repeats p. - Fix rule: Heterozygotes = 2pq; never forget the 2.

6. E — The population is not evolving at that locus. Fix: Constant allele frequencies over generations is the definition of no evolution at that gene. - A: Rapid evolution would change the frequencies, not hold them constant. - B: Strong selection would shift frequencies, not maintain them. - C: Small size promotes drift and change, not stability. - D: Many mutations would introduce change over time. - Fix rule: Frequencies unchanged across generations = no evolution there.

7. D — Genetic drift. Fix: Random, directionless change in allele frequencies, pronounced in small populations, is genetic drift. - A: Selection is non-random and favors particular traits. - B: Gene flow requires movement between populations, not internal chance. - C: Mutation adds new alleles; it is not the random resampling described. - E: "Directional adaptation" implies a consistent selective direction, unlike random drift. - Fix rule: Random frequency change, no direction, small population = drift.

8. E — The bottleneck effect. Fix: A random catastrophe slashes the population, and the survivors' frequencies differ from the original — a bottleneck. - A: The founder effect starts a new population from a few colonists, not a catastrophe on the original. - B: There is no "gene flow effect"; no migration is described. - C: The deaths are random, not selection favoring a trait. - D: Mutation does not describe a sudden loss of most individuals. - Fix rule: Catastrophe crushes a population → survivors' skewed frequencies = bottleneck.

9. A — The founder effect. Fix: A few individuals starting a new population carry only a sample of the original alleles — the founder effect. - B: The bottleneck effect involves a crash of an existing population, not colonization. - C: Gene flow is ongoing exchange, not a one-time founding event. - D: Stabilizing selection is about favoring intermediates, not colonization sampling. - E: Frequencies here shift by chance; equilibrium is not maintained. - Fix rule: A few colonists found a new population → founder effect.

10. E — Make the allele frequencies of the two populations more similar. Fix: Migration plus interbreeding mixes alleles, pulling the two populations' frequencies together. - A: Gene flow reduces, not increases, differences between populations. - B: Gene flow tends to prevent speciation by keeping gene pools connected. - C: It blends variation between groups; it does not erase all variation. - D: Introducing alleles from another population does change frequencies. - Fix rule: Gene flow = a homogenizer; it makes populations more alike.

11. C — Mutation. Fix: Mutation is the only listed process that creates brand-new alleles. - A: Drift only reshuffles the frequencies of existing alleles. - B: Nonrandom mating changes genotype proportions, not the allele menu. - D: The bottleneck effect removes alleles by chance; it does not create new ones. - E: The founder effect samples existing alleles; it adds nothing new. - Fix rule: New alleles come only from mutation; the rest just rearrange what's there.

12. B — Meiosis and fertilization, through recombination and independent assortment. Fix: Sexual reproduction shuffles existing alleles via crossing over, independent assortment, and the random union of gametes, creating new combinations each generation. - A: Binary fission is asexual and produces clones, not new combinations. - C: Replication errors are mutations (new alleles), not recombination of existing ones. - D: Drift changes frequencies randomly; it does not generate new allele combinations within offspring. - E: Mitosis copies cells faithfully, producing no new combinations. - Fix rule: New combinations of existing alleles = meiosis + fertilization (recombination and assortment).

← All lessons
Lesson 13 ›
Score: 0/0 correct