0/0 and ±∞/±∞, apply L'Hôpital's Rule correctly, and identify limits where the rule does not apply because the form is already determinate.c the theorem guarantees.f(a) = f(b) special case of the MVT, cite the Extreme Value Theorem for existence of extrema, and apply the consequences of the MVT (constant and monotonicity results).When you substitute into a quotient and get a meaningless symbol like 0/0 or ∞/∞ — an indeterminate form whose value is not determined by the form alone — you can often resolve the limit by differentiating the top and bottom separately.
L'Hôpital's Rule. If
lim f(x)/g(x)gives the form0/0or±∞/±∞, andfandgare differentiable nearawithg'(x) ≠ 0neara, thenlim f(x)/g(x) = lim f'(x)/g'(x)provided the right-hand limit exists (or is±∞). This also holds for one-sided limits and fora = ±∞.
Two conditions govern every use:
0/0 or ±∞/±∞. If substitution gives 2/0, 0/5, or 3/7, the rule does not apply — the answer is already determined (infinite/DNE, 0, or 3/7 respectively).f and g independently. This is not the quotient rule.Worked (0/0). lim_{x→0} sin(3x)/x substitutes to 0/0. Apply L'Hôpital:
lim_{x→0} sin(3x)/x = lim_{x→0} 3cos(3x)/1 = 3cos(0) = 3
Worked (∞/∞). lim_{x→∞} (ln x)/x is ∞/∞. Apply L'Hôpital:
lim_{x→∞} (ln x)/x = lim_{x→∞} (1/x)/1 = 0
Apply it twice when needed. lim_{x→0} (1 − cos x)/x² is 0/0; differentiating gives (sin x)/(2x), still 0/0; once more gives (cos x)/2 → 1/2. Re-check the form after every application and stop as soon as it becomes determinate.
A disguised derivative. A limit like lim_{x→π} (ln x − ln π)/(x − π) is exactly the definition of the derivative of ln x at x = π, so its value is 1/π. L'Hôpital gives the same result: (1/x)/1 → 1/π.
The MVT links the average rate of change of a function over an interval to its instantaneous rate somewhere inside.
Mean Value Theorem. If
fis continuous on[a, b]and differentiable on(a, b), then there exists at least onecin(a, b)withf'(c) = [f(b) − f(a)] / (b − a)
Geometrically: somewhere strictly between a and b, the tangent line is parallel to the secant line through the endpoints.
[GRAPH: increasing curve y = f(x) on [a, b]
- secant line through endpoints (a, f(a)) and (b, f(b))
- tangent line at interior point (c, f(c)) parallel to the secant
- label: secant slope = [f(b) − f(a)]/(b − a) = f'(c)]
Note the deliberate asymmetry: continuity is required on the closed interval [a, b], but differentiability only on the open interval (a, b). The guaranteed c always lives strictly inside, so any solution equal to a or b is discarded.
Finding c — worked. For f(x) = x² on [1, 5]: f is a polynomial, so the hypotheses hold. Secant slope = (25 − 1)/(5 − 1) = 6. With f'(x) = 2x, solve 2c = 6 ⇒ c = 3, which lies in (1, 5).
Rolle's Theorem. If
fis continuous on[a, b], differentiable on(a, b), andf(a) = f(b), then there is acin(a, b)withf'(c) = 0.
Rolle's is just the MVT when the endpoints have equal height: the secant slope is 0, so the guaranteed tangent is horizontal.
Extreme Value Theorem (EVT). If
fis continuous on a closed interval[a, b], thenfattains an absolute maximum and an absolute minimum on[a, b].
The EVT guarantees extrema exist; it never says where (they may sit at an endpoint).
f'(x) = 0 for every x in an interval, then f is constant there. (Two antiderivatives of the same function differ only by a constant.)f'(x) > 0 throughout, f is increasing; if f'(x) < 0 throughout, f is decreasing.| Intermediate Value Theorem | Mean Value Theorem | |
|---|---|---|
| Needs | f continuous on [a, b] |
f continuous on [a, b] and differentiable on (a, b) |
| Conclusion is about | a function value f(c) |
a derivative value f'(c) (a slope) |
| Typical use | "a solution to f(x) = k exists" |
"some instant matches the average rate" |
One-line hook: IVT is about heights; MVT is about slopes. These existence theorems are a frequent source of CANNOT-style items — statements that contradict a guaranteed conclusion.
0/0 or ±∞/±∞ form, and differentiate top and bottom separately, not as a quotient.x → ±∞, the limit is the ratio of leading coefficients.c is strictly interior.f(a) = f(b) special case giving f'(c) = 0; the EVT guarantees a max and min exist for a continuous function on a closed interval.lim_{x→0} sin(4x)/x =1. A. Form 0/0; L'Hôpital gives 4cos(4x)/1 → 4. (B) forgets the chain factor (treating it as lim sin(4x)/(4x) = 1); (C) mistakes the numerator's limit for the whole quotient; (D) halves the coefficient; (E) wrongly reads 0/0 as automatically undefined. Fix: after L'Hôpital, d/dx[sin(kx)] = k cos(kx) — keep the constant k.
2. E. Substituting x = 2 gives (4 − 4)/(2 − 1) = 0/1 = 0, a determinate form, so L'Hôpital does not apply; the other four are genuine 0/0 or ∞/∞. (A), (C) are 0/0; (B), (D) are ∞/∞. Fix: a 0 over a nonzero number is just 0 — never differentiate it.
lim_{x→π} (ln x − ln π)/(x − π) =3. E. The form is 0/0; L'Hôpital gives (1/x)/1 → 1/π (equivalently, this is the derivative of ln x at x = π). (A) stops at the numerator's limit; (B) assumes any 0/0 equals 1; (C) inverts 1/π; (D) confuses the value with the constant in the numerator. Fix: (f(x) − f(a))/(x − a) → f'(a) — a disguised derivative.
lim_{x→∞} (3x² − 5x)/(2x² + 1) =4. D. Form ∞/∞; equal degrees give the ratio of leading coefficients 3/2 (or apply L'Hôpital twice). (A) assumes the denominator dominates; (B) reads only the leading numerator coefficient; (C) assumes equal-degree limits are 1; (E) assumes the numerator dominates. Fix: equal degree ⇒ limit = leading-coefficient ratio.
f(x) = x² on [1, 5], the value of c guaranteed by the Mean Value Theorem is5. B. Hypotheses hold (polynomial); secant slope = (25 − 1)/4 = 6, and 2c = 6 ⇒ c = 3, in (1, 5). (C) reports the secant slope as c; (D) guesses the interval midpoint; (A), (E) are endpoints or arbitrary. Fix: solve f'(c) = secant slope, then keep only interior solutions.
h satisfies h(2) = 5 and h(7) = 25. The Mean Value Theorem guarantees some c in (2, 7) at which h'(c) =6. C. h'(c) = [h(7) − h(2)]/(7 − 2) = 20/5 = 4. (A) forgets to divide by the interval width 5; (B) divides incorrectly; (D) adds the endpoint values; (E) uses the wrong difference. Fix: the guaranteed slope is the average rate of change — always divide by b − a.
f(x) = x² − 6x + 5 on [1, 5] and guarantees a c with f'(c) = 0. That c is7. B. f(1) = f(5) = 0, so Rolle's applies; f'(x) = 2x − 6 = 0 ⇒ c = 3, in (1, 5). (A), (C) are excluded endpoints; (D) mis-solves 2x − 6 = 0; (E) is arbitrary. Fix: for Rolle's, solve f'(c) = 0 and confirm c is interior.
[a, b] attains an absolute maximum value on [a, b]?8. D. The Extreme Value Theorem guarantees a continuous function on a closed interval attains an absolute max and min. (A) MVT is about slopes; (B) Rolle's gives f'(c) = 0; (C) IVT gives intermediate values; (E) L'Hôpital evaluates limits. Fix: existence of extrema on a closed interval = EVT.
f is continuous on [0, 4] and differentiable on (0, 4), with f(0) = 1 and f(4) = 9. Which of the following statements CANNOT be true?9. D. The average rate of change is (9 − 1)/4 = 2 > 0; if f' < 0 everywhere, f would be decreasing, contradicting f(4) > f(0), so D cannot hold. A guarantees the MVT conclusion (f'(c) = 2); B and C are possible; E follows from the IVT since 1 < 5 < 9. Fix: check each statement against the guaranteed average rate and the existence theorems.
lim_{x→0} (1 − cos x)/x² =10. A. Form 0/0; L'Hôpital gives (sin x)/(2x), still 0/0; again gives (cos x)/2 → 1/2. (B) stops too early at the first numerator; (C) forgets the 2 in the denominator's derivative; (D) doubles it; (E) misreads 0/0 as undefined. Fix: re-check the form after each application; stop only when determinate.
lim_{x→0} (e^{2x} − 1)/sin x =11. C. Form 0/0; L'Hôpital gives 2e^{2x}/cos x → 2e⁰/cos 0 = 2. (A) stops at the numerator; (B) forgets the factor of 2 from the chain rule; (D) drops the coefficient; (E) misreads 0/0. Fix: d/dx[e^{2x}] = 2e^{2x} — keep the chain factor.
f satisfies f(1) = 4 and f(6) = 4. Which conclusion is justified?12. C. Since f(1) = f(6), Rolle's Theorem guarantees a single interior c with f'(c) = 0. (A), (E) over-claim that f is constant; (B) claims f' = 0 everywhere; (D) contradicts the guaranteed critical point. Fix: equal endpoints give one guaranteed horizontal tangent — not a constant function.
1. A. Form 0/0; L'Hôpital gives 4cos(4x)/1 → 4. (B) forgets the chain factor (treating it as lim sin(4x)/(4x) = 1); (C) mistakes the numerator's limit for the whole quotient; (D) halves the coefficient; (E) wrongly reads 0/0 as automatically undefined. Fix: after L'Hôpital, d/dx[sin(kx)] = k cos(kx) — keep the constant k.
2. E. Substituting x = 2 gives (4 − 4)/(2 − 1) = 0/1 = 0, a determinate form, so L'Hôpital does not apply; the other four are genuine 0/0 or ∞/∞. (A), (C) are 0/0; (B), (D) are ∞/∞. Fix: a 0 over a nonzero number is just 0 — never differentiate it.
3. E. The form is 0/0; L'Hôpital gives (1/x)/1 → 1/π (equivalently, this is the derivative of ln x at x = π). (A) stops at the numerator's limit; (B) assumes any 0/0 equals 1; (C) inverts 1/π; (D) confuses the value with the constant in the numerator. Fix: (f(x) − f(a))/(x − a) → f'(a) — a disguised derivative.
4. D. Form ∞/∞; equal degrees give the ratio of leading coefficients 3/2 (or apply L'Hôpital twice). (A) assumes the denominator dominates; (B) reads only the leading numerator coefficient; (C) assumes equal-degree limits are 1; (E) assumes the numerator dominates. Fix: equal degree ⇒ limit = leading-coefficient ratio.
5. B. Hypotheses hold (polynomial); secant slope = (25 − 1)/4 = 6, and 2c = 6 ⇒ c = 3, in (1, 5). (C) reports the secant slope as c; (D) guesses the interval midpoint; (A), (E) are endpoints or arbitrary. Fix: solve f'(c) = secant slope, then keep only interior solutions.
6. C. h'(c) = [h(7) − h(2)]/(7 − 2) = 20/5 = 4. (A) forgets to divide by the interval width 5; (B) divides incorrectly; (D) adds the endpoint values; (E) uses the wrong difference. Fix: the guaranteed slope is the average rate of change — always divide by b − a.
7. B. f(1) = f(5) = 0, so Rolle's applies; f'(x) = 2x − 6 = 0 ⇒ c = 3, in (1, 5). (A), (C) are excluded endpoints; (D) mis-solves 2x − 6 = 0; (E) is arbitrary. Fix: for Rolle's, solve f'(c) = 0 and confirm c is interior.
8. D. The Extreme Value Theorem guarantees a continuous function on a closed interval attains an absolute max and min. (A) MVT is about slopes; (B) Rolle's gives f'(c) = 0; (C) IVT gives intermediate values; (E) L'Hôpital evaluates limits. Fix: existence of extrema on a closed interval = EVT.
9. D. The average rate of change is (9 − 1)/4 = 2 > 0; if f' < 0 everywhere, f would be decreasing, contradicting f(4) > f(0), so D cannot hold. A guarantees the MVT conclusion (f'(c) = 2); B and C are possible; E follows from the IVT since 1 < 5 < 9. Fix: check each statement against the guaranteed average rate and the existence theorems.
10. A. Form 0/0; L'Hôpital gives (sin x)/(2x), still 0/0; again gives (cos x)/2 → 1/2. (B) stops too early at the first numerator; (C) forgets the 2 in the denominator's derivative; (D) doubles it; (E) misreads 0/0 as undefined. Fix: re-check the form after each application; stop only when determinate.
11. C. Form 0/0; L'Hôpital gives 2e^{2x}/cos x → 2e⁰/cos 0 = 2. (A) stops at the numerator; (B) forgets the factor of 2 from the chain rule; (D) drops the coefficient; (E) misreads 0/0. Fix: d/dx[e^{2x}] = 2e^{2x} — keep the chain factor.
12. C. Since f(1) = f(6), Rolle's Theorem guarantees a single interior c with f'(c) = 0. (A), (E) over-claim that f is constant; (B) claims f' = 0 everywhere; (D) contradicts the guaranteed critical point. Fix: equal endpoints give one guaranteed horizontal tangent — not a constant function.