Two savings plans, both starting at $0. Plan L: deposit $50 every week. Plan Q: deposit $10 the first week, $20 the second, $30 the third, and so on.
Week-by-week balances: Plan L: 50, 100, 150, 200, … Plan Q: 10, 30, 60, 100, …
Plan L grows by the same amount each week. Plan Q grows by amounts that themselves grow by the same amount ($10 more each week). That's the entire difference between linear and quadratic functions, seen in a bank account. Today we make it precise.
A linear function f(x) = mx + b has average rate of change m over every interval:
AROC over [a, a+h] = ( m(a+h) + b − (ma + b) ) / h = mh / h = m
Equivalently: over equal-length input intervals, the output changes by equal amounts. In a table with equally spaced x-values, the first differences (each output minus the previous) are constant.
| x | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| f(x) | 7 | 4 | 1 | −2 |
| Δ (first diff) | −3 | −3 | −3 |
Constant first differences of −3 with step 1 → linear with slope −3.
⚠️ If the x-step isn't 1, the slope is Δoutput / Δinput. Differences of −6 with x-step 2 still mean slope −3.
A quadratic f(x) = ax² + bx + c does not have one rate of change — but its rate of change changes in the most orderly way possible: linearly.
Over equal-length input intervals, the first differences of a quadratic change by a constant amount, so the second differences (differences of the differences) are constant.
For f(x) = x²:
| x | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| f(x) | 0 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 16 |
| Δ | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 | |
| Δ² | 2 | 2 | 2 |
The useful algebra fact (worth seeing once): over consecutive intervals of length h, a quadratic's second difference is always 2ah². So from a table you can even recover a: a = Δ² / (2h²).
Given a table with equally spaced inputs:
This routine is the seed of model selection (Lesson 9 and FRQ 1): real data won't be perfectly constant, and you'll say "roughly constant second differences suggest a quadratic model."
For f(x) = ax² + bx + c:
a > 0: second differences positive → rates of change increasing → concave up everywhere → the vertex is a global minimuma < 0: rates decreasing → concave down everywhere → vertex is a global maximumThe vertex sits at x = −b/(2a); a parabola is symmetric about that vertical line. Two zeros, when they exist, sit symmetrically around it — so the vertex x-coordinate is also the average of the zeros.
[GRAPH: Two parabolas on one set of axes. Left: f(x) = x² − 4x + 3 opening upward, vertex (2, −1) marked as global minimum, zeros at x = 1 and x = 3, axis of symmetry x = 2 dashed. Right: g(x) = −x² − 2x + 3... shown shifted right for clarity, opening downward, vertex marked as global maximum. Annotation: "a > 0: concave up, min" and "a < 0: concave down, max".]
A tidy property the exam likes: the average rate of change of a quadratic over [a, b] equals the (instantaneous) rate of change at the midpoint (a+b)/2. You saw this accidentally in Lesson 1, Example 4: AROC of x² over [2.9, 3.1] was exactly 6 — the rate at the midpoint x = 3. You don't need calculus to use the consequence: for a quadratic, AROCs over intervals with the same midpoint are all equal.
Problem: Equally spaced inputs; classify each as linear, quadratic, or neither.
Table 1: outputs 5, 8, 11, 14, 17 Table 2: outputs 2, 3, 6, 11, 18 Table 3: outputs 1, 2, 4, 8, 16
Solution: - Table 1: Δ = 3, 3, 3, 3 → linear - Table 2: Δ = 1, 3, 5, 7; Δ² = 2, 2, 2 → quadratic - Table 3: Δ = 1, 2, 4, 8 — not constant; Δ² = 1, 2, 4 — not constant → neither (ratios are constant: it's exponential, wait for Unit 2)
Interpretation: Difference analysis is a two-step decision tree, and "neither" is a legal answer.
Problem: f is quadratic with equally spaced values: f(0) = 4, f(1) = 7, f(2) = 14, f(3) = 25. Find f(x) = ax² + bx + c.
Strategy: Second difference gives a; f(0) gives c; one more point gives b.
Solution:
Δ: 3, 7, 11 Δ²: 4, 4 → 2a(1)² = 4 → a = 2
f(0) = c = 4
f(1) = 2 + b + 4 = 7 → b = 1
f(x) = 2x² + x + 4
Check with f(3): 2(9) + 3 + 4 = 25 ✓
Interpretation: Constant second differences aren't just a label — they carry the leading coefficient.
Problem: A projectile's height is quadratic in time; it launches from the ground at t = 0 and lands at t = 8 seconds, with maximum height 80 m. Find the height function.
Strategy: Zeros at 0 and 8 → factored form h(t) = at(t − 8); vertex at the midpoint of the zeros.
Solution: Vertex at t = 4 by symmetry. h(4) = a(4)(−4) = −16a = 80 → a = −5.
h(t) = −5t(t − 8) = −5t² + 40t
(The Lesson 1 rocket, unmasked.) a = −5 < 0 ✓ concave down, consistent with a maximum.
Interpretation: Zeros → symmetry → vertex is often faster than completing the square.
Problem: g is quadratic, and the average rate of change of g over [1, 5] is 12. What is the average rate of change of g over [2, 4]?
Solution: Both intervals have midpoint 3. For a quadratic, AROC depends only on the interval's midpoint, so the AROC over [2, 4] is also 12.
Interpretation: No formula for g needed. If a problem seems under-determined, a structural property is usually the intended key. (Why it works: AROC of ax²+bx+c over [p, q] is a(p+q) + b, which depends only on p+q — i.e., only on the midpoint.)
Δy/Δx) instead of bare differences.2m, not m. Fix: always divide by the input step.x = −b/(2a) — students drop the negative or divide by a instead of 2a. Fix: check that the vertex x-value sits midway between the zeros when zeros are easy.1. (C). 1, 4, 9, 16: Δ = 3, 5, 7; Δ² = 2, 2 → quadratic. (B) is linear (Δ = 3, 3, 3). (A) and (D) both grow by constant ratios (×2 in D), not constant second differences: (A) Δ = 3, 6, 12, Δ² = 3, 6; (D) Δ = 2, 4, 8, Δ² = 2, 4 — exponential, the Unit 2 family.
f(x) = −3x² + 12x − 5. The graph of f is2. (B). a = −3 < 0 → concave down → global maximum at the vertex. (A)/(D) mix the pairings; (C) is internally contradictory for a parabola.
3. (D). Δ² = 2ah² → 8 = 2a(2²) = 8a → a = 1. (A) divides by 2 only; (B) uses h not h²; (C) forgets everything and repeats 8.
4. (D). m = (2 − 10)/(7 − 3) = −8/4 = −2. (B) forgets to divide; (A)/(C) drop the sign or invert.
5. (A). Midpoint of −1 and 7: (−1 + 7)/2 = 3. (B) averages incorrectly ((7+1)/2); (C) sign error; (D) is the distance between the zeros minus 2.
q over [0, 6] is 9. Over which interval must the AROC of q also equal 9?6. (C). Same midpoint (3) → same AROC. [1, 5] has midpoint 3. (A) midpoint 1.5, (B) 4.5, (D) 9.
7. (B). Constant differences = constant (nonzero) rate of change: linear. (D) is a trap — the rate is 5, not 0; a zero rate would mean constant outputs.
h(t) = 2t² − 16t + 30. The minimum value of h is8. (C). Vertex at t = −(−16)/(2·2) = 4; h(4) = 2(16) − 64 + 30 = 32 − 64 + 30 = −2. (A) reports the vertex location, not value; (B) is h(0); (D) sign slip.
9. (C). a > 0 → concave up → rate of change increasing everywhere. (A) false (decreasing left of vertex); (B) describes linear; (D) false — e.g. x² + 1.
10. (C). Δ = 14, 4, −6, −16; Δ² = −10, −10, −10 → constant second differences. (B) is true but proves nothing (many families rise then fall); (A) is false; (D) is irrelevant.
11. (D). "Changes change by equal amounts" = constant second differences = quadratic. (A) linear (changes are equal, not changing); (B) exponential (changes change by equal factors); (C) piecewise linear.
12. (FRQ-style, 5 points)
(i) [1 pt] Δ = −16, −12, −8, −4; Δ² = 4, 4, 4. Constant second differences over equal 2-minute steps → consistent with a quadratic model.
(ii) [2 pts] Δ² = 2ah² → 4 = 2a(4) → a = 1/2. c = D(0) = 100. D(2) = (1/2)(4) + 2b + 100 = 84 → 2b = −18 → b = −9.
D(t) = 0.5t² − 9t + 100. Check D(4): 8 − 36 + 100 = 72 ✓
(iii) [2 pts] The model's rate of change hits zero at the vertex: t = −b/(2a) = 9/(2·0.5) = 9 minutes. The model says depth stops decreasing at t = 9 (D(9) = 40.5 − 81 + 100 = 59.5 cm) and would increase afterward — physically implausible for a draining tank. Suggests the tank is essentially done draining near t = 9 and the quadratic model shouldn't be extrapolated past its vertex. [Interpretation/limitation language earns the point — this is FRQ 1's "assumption articulation" skill.]
12. (FRQ-style) 🚫 The table gives the depth of water D(t), in cm, in a draining tank at equally spaced times.
| t (min) | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D(t) | 100 | 84 | 72 | 64 | 60 |
(i) Show that the data are consistent with a quadratic model.
(ii) Find a quadratic model D(t) = at² + bt + c.
(iii) Using your model, when (if ever) does the rate of change of depth equal zero, and what does that suggest about the draining process?
Full 6-point FRQs begin next lesson. Problem 12 is a 5-point warm-up in FRQ format.
1. (C). 1, 4, 9, 16: Δ = 3, 5, 7; Δ² = 2, 2 → quadratic. (B) is linear (Δ = 3, 3, 3). (A) and (D) both grow by constant ratios (×2 in D), not constant second differences: (A) Δ = 3, 6, 12, Δ² = 3, 6; (D) Δ = 2, 4, 8, Δ² = 2, 4 — exponential, the Unit 2 family.
2. (B). a = −3 < 0 → concave down → global maximum at the vertex. (A)/(D) mix the pairings; (C) is internally contradictory for a parabola.
3. (D). Δ² = 2ah² → 8 = 2a(2²) = 8a → a = 1. (A) divides by 2 only; (B) uses h not h²; (C) forgets everything and repeats 8.
4. (D). m = (2 − 10)/(7 − 3) = −8/4 = −2. (B) forgets to divide; (A)/(C) drop the sign or invert.
5. (A). Midpoint of −1 and 7: (−1 + 7)/2 = 3. (B) averages incorrectly ((7+1)/2); (C) sign error; (D) is the distance between the zeros minus 2.
6. (C). Same midpoint (3) → same AROC. [1, 5] has midpoint 3. (A) midpoint 1.5, (B) 4.5, (D) 9.
7. (B). Constant differences = constant (nonzero) rate of change: linear. (D) is a trap — the rate is 5, not 0; a zero rate would mean constant outputs.
8. (C). Vertex at t = −(−16)/(2·2) = 4; h(4) = 2(16) − 64 + 30 = 32 − 64 + 30 = −2. (A) reports the vertex location, not value; (B) is h(0); (D) sign slip.
9. (C). a > 0 → concave up → rate of change increasing everywhere. (A) false (decreasing left of vertex); (B) describes linear; (D) false — e.g. x² + 1.
10. (C). Δ = 14, 4, −6, −16; Δ² = −10, −10, −10 → constant second differences. (B) is true but proves nothing (many families rise then fall); (A) is false; (D) is irrelevant.
11. (D). "Changes change by equal amounts" = constant second differences = quadratic. (A) linear (changes are equal, not changing); (B) exponential (changes change by equal factors); (C) piecewise linear.
12. (FRQ-style, 5 points)
(i) [1 pt] Δ = −16, −12, −8, −4; Δ² = 4, 4, 4. Constant second differences over equal 2-minute steps → consistent with a quadratic model.
(ii) [2 pts] Δ² = 2ah² → 4 = 2a(4) → a = 1/2. c = D(0) = 100. D(2) = (1/2)(4) + 2b + 100 = 84 → 2b = −18 → b = −9.
D(t) = 0.5t² − 9t + 100. Check D(4): 8 − 36 + 100 = 72 ✓
(iii) [2 pts] The model's rate of change hits zero at the vertex: t = −b/(2a) = 9/(2·0.5) = 9 minutes. The model says depth stops decreasing at t = 9 (D(9) = 40.5 − 81 + 100 = 59.5 cm) and would increase afterward — physically implausible for a draining tank. Suggests the tank is essentially done draining near t = 9 and the quadratic model shouldn't be extrapolated past its vertex. [Interpretation/limitation language earns the point — this is FRQ 1's "assumption articulation" skill.]
🎯 Exam tip: When a no-calc MC question hands you a table, your first move is always the same: check input spacing, run first differences, run second differences if needed. Fifteen seconds of arithmetic classifies the family and usually eliminates two answer choices immediately.