Imagine two farms. One grows a single variety of corn across a thousand acres. The other grows dozens of crop varieties mixed together. A new fungus arrives. On the first farm, if the fungus can kill that one variety, it kills everything. On the second, some varieties resist, and the farm survives. That's the whole argument for biodiversity in one image: variety is insurance. More kinds of genes, species, and habitats mean more ways for a system to absorb a shock and keep functioning. This lesson defines the three levels of biodiversity, shows why they make ecosystems resilient, and catalogs the free services nature provides that we'd otherwise have to pay for.
Biodiversity is the variety of life, measured at three scales:
[DIAGRAM: Two communities, each with 4 species and 100 individuals. Community A: 25/25/25/25 (high evenness). Community B: 91/3/3/3 (low evenness). Same richness (4), but A has higher diversity. Label "richness = # species; evenness = balance of abundances."]
Diversity indices such as Simpson's and Shannon combine richness and evenness into one number — higher values mean more diversity. You won't compute Shannon by hand, but you should interpret that a higher index = greater diversity, and read comparative index values from a table.
Higher biodiversity generally increases both, because functional redundancy means if one species is lost, another can fill its role. Diverse ecosystems are more stable and productive over time. Species that are especially important include:
Ecosystem services are the benefits humans get from functioning ecosystems, often grouped in four categories:
| Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| Provisioning | Food, fresh water, timber, fiber, medicine |
| Regulating | Climate regulation, water filtration, pollination, flood/erosion control, disease control |
| Cultural | Recreation, aesthetic and spiritual value, ecotourism |
| Supporting | Nutrient cycling, soil formation, primary production (underpin the other three) |
Pollinators alone (bees, bats, birds) support a large share of global food crops. Wetlands filter water and buffer floods. Forests regulate climate and prevent erosion. Assigning economic value to these services (e.g., the cost to replace pollination or water filtration with technology) is a common way to justify conservation.
The major drivers, summarized by the acronym HIPPCO (developed further in Lesson 29): - Habitat destruction/fragmentation (the #1 cause) - Invasive species - Population growth (human) - Pollution - Climate change - Overexploitation (overharvesting/overhunting)
Biodiversity questions appear as data-table reading (compare richness/evenness or index values), as concept questions (keystone vs. indicator species), and as FRQ solution prompts (justify a conservation action by its ecosystem services). This unit is small in weight but high-yield because it's straightforward.
Plot A has 12 species with fairly equal abundances. Plot B has 12 species but one makes up 90% of individuals. Which has higher species diversity?
Solution: Same richness (12), but Plot A has higher evenness, so Plot A has higher species diversity.
Interpretation: Diversity isn't just how many species — it's how evenly individuals are spread among them.
Sea otters eat sea urchins, which graze kelp. Predict what happens to a kelp forest if otters are removed.
Solution: Without otters, urchin populations explode, urchins overgraze the kelp, the kelp forest collapses, and the many species depending on kelp habitat decline. The otter is a keystone species — its impact far exceeds its abundance.
Interpretation: Keystone = outsized role. Removing it triggers a trophic cascade.
Explain why a banana plantation of a single genetically identical variety is at high risk from a new fungal disease, and how genetic diversity would reduce that risk.
Solution: All plants share the same genes, so if the fungus can infect one, it can infect all — no individuals possess resistance genes. A genetically diverse crop would contain some individuals with resistance, so the disease could not wipe out the entire crop; survivors preserve the harvest and the population.
Interpretation: Monoculture = zero genetic diversity = maximum vulnerability. This links to Unit 5 agriculture.
A wetland upstream of a city naturally filters pollutants and controls floods. The city considers draining it for development. Give one economic argument for preserving it.
Solution: The wetland provides regulating services (water filtration and flood control) for free; replacing them would require building a water-treatment plant and flood-control infrastructure costing far more than the development gains. Preserving the wetland avoids those costs and preserves provisioning/cultural value.
Interpretation: Framing services as avoided costs is the standard APES economic-justification move.
(B) Resilience = recovery after disturbance. (A) is resistance.
Ecological: a biodiverse rainforest is more resilient, stores carbon, cycles nutrients, and houses keystone/endemic species; logging causes habitat destruction and biodiversity loss. Economic: it provides provisioning (medicines, timber sustainably), regulating (climate, water), and cultural (ecotourism) services worth more preserved than the one-time logging revenue.
(a) Forest X (higher Shannon index = more diverse). (b) Forest Y's low diversity means less functional redundancy, so a disease could spread with fewer resistant species/genes, reducing its ability to recover.
FRQ rubric (10 pts): - (a) For each of two services: 1 pt name + correct category (e.g., water filtration = regulating; fish nursery/food = provisioning/supporting; ecotourism = cultural). (2) - (b) 1 pt states biodiversity declines; 1 pt correctly ties it to a HIPPCO factor (habitat destruction is the clearest). (2) - (c) 1 pt mangroves buffer wave/storm-surge energy and reduce erosion; 1 pt their removal exposes the coast to greater storm and flood damage. (2) - (d) For each of two solutions: 1 pt name + 1 pt justification. Acceptable: protect a core mangrove reserve while developing only degraded areas; require sustainable/low-impact shrimp aquaculture; establish buffer zones; ecotourism as an alternative revenue source; replanting/restoration offsets. (4)
A coastal region plans to convert 40% of its mangrove wetlands into shrimp farms and resorts.
(a) Identify two ecosystem services the mangroves currently provide, naming the service category for each. (2 pts) (b) Describe how converting the mangroves would affect local biodiversity, referencing at least one HIPPCO factor. (2 pts) (c) Explain how the loss of mangroves could increase the region's vulnerability to storms. (2 pts) (d) Propose two solutions that balance economic development with biodiversity protection, and justify each. (4 pts)
MC: 1. (C) Diversity = richness + evenness. 2. (C) Keystone species. (A) signals health; (B)/(D) different concepts. 3. (B) Genetic diversity enables adaptation and disease resistance. 4. (B) Pollination is a regulating service. 5. (B) Habitat destruction is the #1 threat. 6. (A) Higher evenness → higher diversity. 7. (C) Indicator species. (D) pioneer relates to succession. 8. (B) Nutrient cycling is a supporting service. (A) provisioning, (C) cultural, (D) regulating. 9. (B) Monoculture = low genetic diversity. 10. (B) Resilience = recovery after disturbance. (A) is resistance.
Ecological: a biodiverse rainforest is more resilient, stores carbon, cycles nutrients, and houses keystone/endemic species; logging causes habitat destruction and biodiversity loss. Economic: it provides provisioning (medicines, timber sustainably), regulating (climate, water), and cultural (ecotourism) services worth more preserved than the one-time logging revenue.
(a) Forest X (higher Shannon index = more diverse). (b) Forest Y's low diversity means less functional redundancy, so a disease could spread with fewer resistant species/genes, reducing its ability to recover.
FRQ rubric (10 pts): - (a) For each of two services: 1 pt name + correct category (e.g., water filtration = regulating; fish nursery/food = provisioning/supporting; ecotourism = cultural). (2) - (b) 1 pt states biodiversity declines; 1 pt correctly ties it to a HIPPCO factor (habitat destruction is the clearest). (2) - (c) 1 pt mangroves buffer wave/storm-surge energy and reduce erosion; 1 pt their removal exposes the coast to greater storm and flood damage. (2) - (d) For each of two solutions: 1 pt name + 1 pt justification. Acceptable: protect a core mangrove reserve while developing only degraded areas; require sustainable/low-impact shrimp aquaculture; establish buffer zones; ecotourism as an alternative revenue source; replanting/restoration offsets. (4)
⭐ Exam strategy: On any "why protect this ecosystem" FRQ, give BOTH an ecological reason (resilience, keystone role, HIPPCO threat avoided) AND an economic one (name the ecosystem-service category and frame it as avoided cost). Graders reward the two-lens answer.
Content pending external review.