A continuous function f has derivative f'(x) = (x + 2)(x − 3). You are told nothing else about f. Answer using only this information:
f increasing? Decreasing?x = −2 and x = 3, does f have a relative maximum, a relative minimum, or neither?f' is an upward parabola. Where does f' have its minimum, and what does that point tell you about the shape of the graph of f there?Try it before reading on. The key move is realizing that f'(x) = (x + 2)(x − 3) is a parabola with roots at −2 and 3 — and the roots of f' are the critical points of f, while the vertex of f' (its minimum, at x = ½) is where f' is smallest, i.e., where f is steepest downward and f'' changes sign. That vertex is an inflection point of f. This lesson is about turning that kind of derivative information into a picture — and reading the picture backward.
Curve sketching is the capstone of Unit 5: you combine everything — limits, intercepts, and the two derivative tests — into one coherent graph. On the AP exam this shows up two ways: (1) "sketch a graph with these features," and (2) the far more common reverse task, "here is the graph of f' — describe f." Both reward the same fluency: knowing exactly what each derivative controls.
Work these in order. Skipping a step is how points (and asymptotes) get lost.
f defined? Exclude zeros of denominators and arguments that break a function (e.g., negatives under even roots).f(0). x-intercepts: solve f(x) = 0 (numerator = 0 for a rational function).f(−x) = f(x), symmetric across the y-axis) or odd (f(−x) = −f(x), symmetric about the origin). Optional but it halves the work.lim f = ±∞. Horizontal asymptotes come from lim_{x→±∞} f(x); for a rational function compare degrees of numerator and denominator.f'). Find f', locate critical points (where f' = 0 or f' is undefined). Build a sign chart for f': f is increasing where f' > 0, decreasing where f' < 0. Classify each critical point by the First Derivative Test (sign change of f').f''). Find f''. Build a sign chart for f'': f is concave up where f'' > 0, concave down where f'' < 0. An inflection point occurs where f'' changes sign (and f is defined there).y-values, then connect using the increasing/decreasing and concavity information.f, f', and f''This table is the engine of the whole lesson. Read it both directions.
Feature of the graph of f | What f' does | What f'' does |
|---|---|---|
f increasing | f' > 0 (above x-axis) | — |
f decreasing | f' < 0 (below x-axis) | — |
f has a relative max | f' = 0 and changes + to − | f'' < 0 (concave down) |
f has a relative min | f' = 0 and changes − to + | f'' > 0 (concave up) |
f concave up | f' increasing | f'' > 0 (above x-axis) |
f concave down | f' decreasing | f'' < 0 (below x-axis) |
f has an inflection point | f' has a local max or min | f'' changes sign (crosses x-axis) |
Two traps hide in this table. First: an x-intercept of f' is a critical point of f, not necessarily an extremum — f' must change sign. Second: an x-intercept of f'' is a candidate inflection point, but f'' must change sign there. A local extremum of f' corresponds to an inflection point of f — because where f' peaks or bottoms out, f'' (its derivative) is zero and switching sign.
Sketch f(x) = x² / (x² − 4).
Domain. Denominator x² − 4 = (x − 2)(x + 2) is zero at x = ±2. Domain: all x ≠ ±2.
Intercepts. f(0) = 0/(−4) = 0. The only x-intercept is where the numerator x² = 0, i.e., x = 0. So the curve passes through (0, 0) and that is both intercepts.
Symmetry. f(−x) = (−x)²/((−x)² − 4) = x²/(x² − 4) = f(x). Even — symmetric across the y-axis.
Vertical asymptotes. At x = 2 and x = −2 (denominator zero, numerator nonzero). Check a side: as x → 2⁺, numerator → 4, denominator → 0⁺, so f → +∞.
Horizontal asymptote. Degrees of numerator and denominator are equal (both 2), so lim_{x→±∞} f(x) = ratio of leading coefficients = 1. Horizontal asymptote y = 1.
First derivative. By the quotient rule:
f'(x) = [2x(x² − 4) − x²(2x)] / (x² − 4)²
= (2x³ − 8x − 2x³) / (x² − 4)²
= −8x / (x² − 4)²
The denominator (x² − 4)² is always positive (where defined), so the sign of f' is the sign of −8x. Critical point: f' = 0 at x = 0. So f' > 0 for x < 0 and f' < 0 for x > 0. f increasing on (−∞, −2) and (−2, 0); decreasing on (0, 2) and (2, ∞). At x = 0, f' changes + to −, so (0, 0) is a relative maximum.
Second derivative. Differentiate f'(x) = −8x(x² − 4)^(−2):
f''(x) = −8(x² − 4)^(−2) + (−8x)(−2)(x² − 4)^(−3)(2x)
= (x² − 4)^(−3) [ −8(x² − 4) + 32x² ]
= (24x² + 32) / (x² − 4)³
The numerator 24x² + 32 is always positive, so the sign of f'' is the sign of (x² − 4)³, which matches the sign of x² − 4. So f'' > 0 (concave up) when |x| > 2, and f'' < 0 (concave down) when |x| < 2. The sign changes occur only at x = ±2, which are not in the domain — so there are no inflection points.
Sketch.
Notice how each checklist item became a feature of the curve. The asymptotes frame the picture; the single critical point gives the peak; the concavity tells you how the branches bend toward y = 1.
Problem. Sketch f(x) = x³ − 3x² − 9x + 5. State intercepts (y only — x-intercepts are irrational), extrema, intervals of increase/decrease, concavity, and inflection point.
Strategy. Polynomials have domain all reals, no asymptotes, and no symmetry here. Go straight to intercepts, then f' and f''.
Solution.
f(0) = 5, point (0, 5).f'(x) = 3x² − 6x − 9 = 3(x² − 2x − 3) = 3(x − 3)(x + 1). Critical points x = −1, 3. - Sign chart: f' > 0 on (−∞, −1), f' < 0 on (−1, 3), f' > 0 on (3, ∞).
- At x = −1: f' changes + to − → relative max; f(−1) = −1 − 3 + 9 + 5 = 10, point (−1, 10).
- At x = 3: f' changes − to + → relative min; f(3) = 27 − 27 − 27 + 5 = −22, point (3, −22).
f''(x) = 6x − 6 = 6(x − 1). Zero at x = 1; f'' < 0 for x < 1 (concave down), f'' > 0 for x > 1 (concave up). Sign change → inflection point at x = 1; f(1) = 1 − 3 − 9 + 5 = −6, point (1, −6).Justification. f has a relative maximum at x = −1 because f' changes from positive to negative there; a relative minimum at x = 3 because f' changes from negative to positive; and an inflection point at x = 1 because f'' changes sign (from negative to positive) there.
Problem. Sketch f(x) = (x + 1)/(x − 2).
Strategy. Find domain, intercepts, both asymptotes, then f' (concavity follows quickly).
Solution.
x ≠ 2.f(0) = 1/(−2) = −½ → (0, −½). Numerator x + 1 = 0 → x-intercept (−1, 0).x = 2. As x → 2⁺, numerator → 3, denominator → 0⁺, so f → +∞; as x → 2⁻, f → −∞.= 1, so y = 1.f': quotient rule, f'(x) = [(1)(x − 2) − (x + 1)(1)]/(x − 2)² = (x − 2 − x − 1)/(x − 2)² = −3/(x − 2)². - −3/(x − 2)² < 0 everywhere in the domain → f is decreasing on (−∞, 2) and on (2, ∞). No critical points, no extrema.
f'': f'(x) = −3(x − 2)^(−2), so f''(x) = 6(x − 2)^(−3) = 6/(x − 2)³. Sign matches (x − 2)³: f'' < 0 for x < 2 (concave down), f'' > 0 for x > 2 (concave up). No inflection point (x = 2 not in domain).f', deduce features of f — [NO CALC]Problem. The graph of f' (the derivative) is shown. f' is positive on (−∞, 1), crosses zero going negative at x = 1, reaches a minimum at x = 3, crosses zero going positive at x = 5, and is positive thereafter. On (−∞, 3) the graph of f' is decreasing; on (3, ∞) it is increasing.
Strategy. Translate each feature of f' into a statement about f, using the table from Core Concepts. Sign of f' → increase/decrease of f. Zeros of f' with sign change → extrema of f. Extrema of f' → inflection points of f.
Solution.
f: f is increasing where f' > 0: on (−∞, 1) and (5, ∞). f is decreasing where f' < 0: on (1, 5).f: At x = 1, f' changes + to − → f has a relative maximum. At x = 5, f' changes − to + → f has a relative minimum.f: f is concave up where f' is increasing and concave down where f' is decreasing. f' decreases on (−∞, 3) (so f concave down) and increases on (3, ∞) (so f concave up). Therefore f has an inflection point at x = 3 — exactly where f' reaches its minimum.Justification. f has a relative maximum at x = 1 because f' changes from positive to negative there. f has an inflection point at x = 3 because f' (and hence the slope of f) changes from decreasing to increasing there, so f'' changes sign.
Problem. The function g(x) = x³ − 3x is graphed. Which graph is g'?
(A) a line through the origin with positive slope
(B) an upward parabola with x-intercepts at x = ±1 and vertex at (0, −3)
(C) an upward parabola with vertex at (0, 3), no real roots
(D) a downward parabola with x-intercepts at x = ±1
Strategy. Compute g' directly, then match shape and roots. g'(x) = 3x² − 3 = 3(x² − 1).
Solution. g'(x) = 3x² − 3 is an upward parabola (positive leading coefficient), with roots where 3x² − 3 = 0 → x = ±1, and value at x = 0 of g'(0) = −3, so vertex (0, −3). That is choice (B). As a sanity check: g has its local max at x = −1 and local min at x = 1 (its critical points), which must be the roots of g' — and (B)'s roots are at x = ±1. ✓
Confusing the graphs of f, f', and f''. The most common Unit 5 error. When a problem hands you "the graph of f'," students read its y-values as values of f. Why it's wrong: a point on the f' graph is a slope of f, not a height. Fix: before answering, write at the top of your work which function is graphed, then translate every feature through the table — sign of f' controls increase/decrease, not the value of f'.
Reading extrema of f off the wrong graph. Students mark a relative max of f where the graph of f' has a maximum. Why it's wrong: a max of f' is where the slope of f is largest — that's an inflection point of f, not an extremum. Fix: extrema of f live at the x-intercepts of f' (with a sign change); maxima/minima of f' are inflection points of f.
Missing or mis-placing asymptotes. Students forget vertical asymptotes entirely, or draw a horizontal asymptote at the wrong height. Why it's wrong: skipping the domain step hides denominator zeros; guessing the HA ignores the degree comparison. Fix: always do the domain step first (VA candidates = zeros of denominator that don't cancel), and compute lim_{x→±∞} explicitly for the HA.
Sign-chart errors — claiming an extremum or inflection without a sign change. f'(c) = 0 does not guarantee an extremum, and f''(c) = 0 does not guarantee an inflection point. Why it's wrong: f(x) = x³ has f'(0) = 0 but no extremum, and f(x) = x⁴ has f''(0) = 0 but no inflection. Fix: always test the sign on both sides and require an actual change of sign.
Forgetting that asymptote-values can't be inflection points. A concavity sign change at a vertical asymptote is not an inflection point because f is undefined there. Fix: an inflection point requires f to be defined and continuous at that x.
f' is positive on (−∞, 2) and negative on (2, ∞). At x = 2, the function f has:f(x) = x³ − 3x² + 4, the x-coordinate of the inflection point is:f(x) = (2x − 6)/(x + 4) has horizontal asymptote:f''(x) > 0 for all x in (a, b), then on (a, b) the graph of f is:f' has a relative maximum at x = 4. Then the graph of f has, at x = 4:f(x) = x/(x² + 1), the y-intercept is:f(x) = x⁴ − 8x² + 3. Using a graph or numerical solver, how many inflection points does f have?f' crosses the x-axis at x = −1 (from − to +) and at x = 3 (from + to −). Which statement about f is correct?[NO CALC — justification] For f(x) = (x²)/(x − 3), find the vertical and horizontal/slant behavior and all critical points. Justify whether each critical point is a relative max or min.
f'(x) = (x − 1)² (a parabola touching the x-axis at x = 1). What happens to f at x = 1?f(x) = x³ − 6x² + 9x + 1, use your calculator to confirm the relative maximum value of f. It is:The table gives the sign of f' and f'':
| Interval | x < 1 | 1 < x < 4 | x > 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| sign of f' | + | + | − |
| sign of f'' | + | − | − |
At x = 1 and x = 4, identify what f has. (Short answer.)
[NO CALC — justification] The graph of f' is shown:
Using justification language, state the intervals where f is increasing/decreasing, classify the behavior of f at x = 0 and x = 4, and identify the x-coordinate of any inflection point of f.
f is even, has a horizontal asymptote y = 2, a vertical asymptote at x = 0, and is concave up on its whole domain. Which is consistent?f(x) = (x² − 1)/(x² + 1), use a graph to determine the horizontal asymptote and the number of relative extrema.Free-Response Question (No calculator). Total: 9 points.
Let f be a twice-differentiable function defined for all real numbers. The graph of f', the derivative of f, is shown below. The graph of f' consists of features described here:
(a) On what open intervals is the graph of f increasing? Give a reason for your answer. (2 points)
(b) Find the x-coordinates of all relative extrema of f on (−4, 5). For each, state whether f has a relative maximum or minimum and justify your answer. (3 points)
(c) On what open intervals is the graph of f concave down? Give a reason for your answer in terms of f'. (2 points)
(d) Find the x-coordinates of all points of inflection of the graph of f on (−4, 5). Justify your answer. (2 points)
(a) f is increasing on (−3, 1) and on (4, 5).
Reason: f is increasing where f' > 0, and from the graph f'(x) > 0 on (−3, 1) and on (4, 5).
(b) Relative extrema occur where f' changes sign.
x = −3: f' changes from negative to positive → f has a relative minimum.x = 1: f' changes from positive to negative → f has a relative maximum.x = 4: f' changes from negative to positive → f has a relative minimum.(Note: x = −1 and x = 3 are not extrema — f' does not equal zero there and does not change sign; they are where f' has its own extrema.)
(c) f is concave down where f''< 0, i.e., where f' is decreasing. From the graph, f' is decreasing on (−1, 3). Therefore f is concave down on (−1, 3).
(d) Points of inflection occur where f'' changes sign, i.e., where f' changes from increasing to decreasing or vice versa — the relative extrema of f'. f' has a relative maximum at x = −1 (changes increasing → decreasing) and a relative minimum at x = 3 (changes decreasing → increasing). Therefore f has points of inflection at x = −1 and x = 3.
| Part | Points | Earned for |
|---|---|---|
| (a) | 2 | 1 pt: correct intervals (−3, 1) and (4, 5). 1 pt: reason "f increasing where f' > 0." |
| (b) | 3 | 1 pt: correct x-values −3, 1, 4. 1 pt: correct classification of each. 1 pt: justification by sign change of f'. |
| (c) | 2 | 1 pt: interval (−1, 3). 1 pt: reason "f' is decreasing (so f'' < 0)." |
| (d) | 2 | 1 pt: x = −1 and x = 3. 1 pt: justification "f' changes from increasing to decreasing / decreasing to increasing." |
Where students lose points:
x = −1 and x = 3 as extrema — the classic confusion of f''s extrema with f's. Those are inflection points, not extrema.f' instead of whether f' is increasing or decreasing. Concavity depends on f'', which is the slope of f'. Say "f' is decreasing," not "f' is negative."f', not just a correct interval.f'' = 0" without confirming a sign change. State the change explicitly.1. (A) f' changes from + to − at x = 2, so f has a relative maximum. (C) reverses the test; (B) needs a sign change of f'', not f'; (D) confuses a sign change with an undefined point.
2. (B) f'' = 6x − 6 = 0 → x = 1, and f'' changes sign there. (A) is a critical point of f' reasoning slip; (C),(D) misread the second derivative.
3. (D) Equal degrees → ratio of leading coefficients 2/1 = 2, so y = 2. (C) assumes numerator degree < denominator; (B) reads off the vertical asymptote x = −4; (A) ignores the degree rule.
4. (D) f'' > 0 means concave up by definition. (C),(A) confuse the second derivative with the first; (B) reverses the concavity sign.
5. (A) A relative max of f' is where the slope of f is greatest — f'' changes sign — an inflection point of f. (D),(B) read the extremum of f' as an extremum of f; (C) is unrelated.
6. (C) f(0) = 0/(0 + 1) = 0. (B),(D) are arithmetic slips; (A) wrongly assumes the denominator is zero.
7. (C) f''(x) = 12x² − 16, zero at x = ±√(4/3) ≈ ±1.155, and f'' changes sign at each — 2 inflection points. Calculator confirms two concavity changes. (A),(B),(D) miscount sign changes.
8. (B) At x = −1, f' goes − to + → relative min; at x = 3, f' goes + to − → relative max. (D) reverses both; (A) treats sign changes of f' as inflection points; (C) is incoherent.
9. Domain x ≠ 3. Vertical asymptote x = 3 (denominator zero, numerator 9 ≠ 0). Degree of numerator (2) exceeds denominator (1) by one, so there is a slant asymptote, not a horizontal one: polynomial division gives f(x) = x + 3 + 9/(x − 3), so the slant asymptote is y = x + 3.
f'(x) = [2x(x − 3) − x²(1)]/(x − 3)² = (x² − 6x)/(x − 3)² = x(x − 6)/(x − 3)². Critical points x = 0 and x = 6 (x = 3 excluded). Sign of f' follows x(x − 6): positive on (−∞, 0), negative on (0, 3) and (3, 6), positive on (6, ∞).
- At x = 0: f' changes + to − → relative maximum; f(0) = 0.
- At x = 6: f' changes − to + → relative minimum; f(6) = 36/3 = 12.
Justification: f has a relative maximum at x = 0 because f' changes from positive to negative there, and a relative minimum at x = 6 because f' changes from negative to positive there.
10. (A) f'(x) = (x − 1)² ≥ 0, touching zero at x = 1 without changing sign — f' > 0 on both sides. So f keeps increasing through x = 1 (it has a horizontal tangent but no extremum). (D),(B) require a sign change of f'; (C) misreads — f does have an inflection point at x=1 since f''=2(x-1) changes sign, but f "keeps increasing" is the asked behavior, and (A) is the fully correct description of what happens to f's increase.
11. (D) f'(x) = 3x² − 12x + 9 = 3(x − 1)(x − 3); relative max at x = 1 (f' + to −); f(1) = 1 − 6 + 9 + 1 = 5. Calculator graph confirms a peak at (1, 5). (A) is f(0); (C),(B) are miscomputations.
12. At x = 1: f' stays positive (no extremum) but f'' changes from + to − → inflection point (concavity changes, f keeps increasing). At x = 4: f' changes from + to − → relative maximum (f'' stays negative, consistent with a max).
13. f is increasing on (0, 4) because f' > 0 there, and decreasing on (−2, 0) and (4, 6) because f' < 0 there.
- At x = 0: f' changes from negative to positive → f has a relative minimum.
- At x = 4: f' changes from positive to negative → f has a relative maximum.
- Inflection point at x = 2, because f' has a relative maximum there — f' changes from increasing to decreasing, so f'' changes sign.
14. (B) f(x) = 2 + 1/x² is even, has HA y = 2 (1/x² → 0), VA at x = 0, and f''(x) = 6/x⁴ > 0 everywhere → concave up throughout. (D) is odd-ish, HA y = 2 but VA behavior and concavity fail (concave down for x>0); (A) is concave down; (C) has no asymptotes.
15. (C) f(x) = (x² − 1)/(x² + 1): equal degrees → HA y = 1. f'(x) = [2x(x²+1) − (x²−1)(2x)]/(x²+1)² = 4x/(x²+1)², zero only at x = 0 (a relative minimum, value −1). One extremum. (B) wrong HA; (A) overcounts extrema; (D) wrong HA.
CalcIQ · Lesson 24 of 35 · Unit 5: Analytical Applications of Differentiation · Curve Sketching
This lesson is independent study material for AP® Calculus AB exam preparation. AP® is a registered trademark of the College Board, which was not involved in the production of and does not endorse this product.
Accuracy review: every domain, intercept, asymptote, critical point, extremum, concavity interval, and inflection point in this lesson was computed and independently re-verified. Derivatives were checked by re-differentiation; sign charts were confirmed by test-point evaluation. Flagged for QC (Isaac): Practice #10 answer rationale — f does have an inflection point at x=1, but the keyed answer (D) describes the increasing behavior the stem asks about; confirm this is the intended emphasis.