Before you read anything, try this multi-skill warm-up. It quietly touches five different Unit 1 ideas. No calculator.
Let
⎧ (x² - 4)/(x - 2), x < 2
f(x) = ⎨ 5, x = 2
⎩ (3x² + 1)/(x² - 1), x > 2
(i) Find lim_{x→2⁻} f(x).
(ii) Find lim_{x→2⁺} f(x).
(iii) Does lim_{x→2} f(x) exist? If so, what is it?
(iv) Is f continuous at x = 2? Name the type of any discontinuity.
(v) Find lim_{x→∞} f(x).
Take two minutes. Jot answers before peeking. (i) is a factor-and-cancel 0/0. (ii) is a direct substitution that does not hit a zero denominator. (iii) compares the two one-sided results. (iv) checks the three-part continuity definition against f(2) = 5. (v) is a limit at infinity — compare leading-degree behavior. Full solution lives in the Answer Key as Warm-Up.
You have learned a pile of separate techniques. The exam does not tell you which one to use — recognizing the situation is the skill. This section is a synthesis, not a re-teach. Keep it as your one-page map.
To evaluate lim_{x→c} f(x), walk this ladder top to bottom and stop at the first rule that works.
Try direct substitution. If f is built from polynomials, rationals, roots, trig, exponential, or log functions and c is in the domain, then lim_{x→c} f(x) = f(c). This is the definition of continuity working for you. Most limits that "look hard" actually substitute cleanly.
Read the form you get.
- A finite number → that's the answer. Done.
- (nonzero)/0 → the limit is infinite (±∞) or does not exist. Check the sign of the denominator from each side to decide +∞, −∞, or DNE. This signals a vertical asymptote.
- 0/0 → indeterminate. Substitution failed; the limit may still exist. Go to step 3.
Resolve a 0/0 form with one of three algebraic moves:
- Factor and cancel the common factor causing the zero. (e.g. (x²−4)/(x−2) = x+2.)
- Rationalize when a square root is present — multiply by the conjugate. (e.g. (√(x+1)−1)/x.)
- Combine/simplify complex fractions or use a known special limit:
lim_{x→0} (sin x)/x = 1 lim_{x→0} (1 − cos x)/x = 0
(Both require x in radians. The second is often written lim_{x→0} (cos x − 1)/x = 0.)
Limits at infinity (x→±∞) for a rational function: compare the degrees of numerator (n) and denominator (d).
- n < d → limit is 0 (horizontal asymptote y = 0).
- n = d → limit is the ratio of leading coefficients (horizontal asymptote at that value).
- n > d → limit is ±∞ (no horizontal asymptote; may be a slant asymptote, not tested for value on AB).
A clean trick: divide every term by the highest power of x in the denominator. For roots, remember √(x²) = |x|, so as x→−∞ a sign flip appears.
Squeeze (Sandwich) Theorem when f is trapped between two functions sharing a limit: if g(x) ≤ f(x) ≤ h(x) near c and lim g = lim h = L, then lim f = L. The classic is lim_{x→0} x² sin(1/x) = 0.
### Existence of a limit
lim_{x→c} f(x) = L exists iff the one-sided limits agree:
lim_{x→c⁻} f(x) = lim_{x→c⁺} f(x) = L
A limit can exist even when f(c) is undefined or has a different value. A limit fails to exist when the one-sided limits disagree (jump), when the function grows without bound (infinite), or when it oscillates (e.g. sin(1/x) near 0).
f is continuous at x = c iff all three hold:
1. f(c) is defined
2. lim_{x→c} f(x) exists
3. lim_{x→c} f(x) = f(c)
If any condition fails, classify the discontinuity:
lim_{x→c} f(x) exists but ≠ f(c) (or f(c) undefined). You could "patch" it by redefining one point.±∞. Lives at a vertical asymptote.A function is continuous on an interval if it is continuous at every point inside it (using one-sided continuity at closed endpoints).
IVT. If
fis continuous on the closed interval[a, b]andkis any value betweenf(a)andf(b), then there exists at least onecin(a, b)withf(c) = k.
IVT is an existence theorem — it guarantees a solution exists; it never tells you the value of c or how many. To invoke it on the exam you must (1) state continuity on [a, b], and (2) show k lies strictly between f(a) and f(b). The most common use is proving an equation f(x) = k (often = 0) has a root in an interval.
lim_{x→0} (sin x)/x = 1 and lim_{x→0} (1 − cos x)/x = 0.0.±∞; vertical asymptotes come from (nonzero)/0.[GRAPH: piecewise f on [-2, 5] × [-1, 6]
- Open circle at (1, 4), closed circle at (1, 2): the curve approaches y=4 from both sides but f(1)=2
- Smooth curve approaching (3, 1) from the left (open circle), and approaching (3, 5) from the right (open circle); no point plotted at x=3
- Vertical asymptote at x = 4: branch to the left rises to +∞, branch to the right drops to −∞
- Otherwise continuous]
Problem. Find: (a) lim_{x→1} f(x) and f(1); (b) lim_{x→3} f(x); (c) lim_{x→4⁻} f(x); (d) classify each discontinuity.
Strategy. Limits care about approach, not the plotted point. Compare left and right at each break.
Solution.
(a) Both sides approach 4, so lim_{x→1} f(x) = 4. But the solid dot says f(1) = 2. Limit exists; value of the function differs.
(b) Left side → 1, right side → 5. They disagree, so lim_{x→3} f(x) does not exist.
(c) The left branch rises without bound: lim_{x→4⁻} f(x) = +∞ (so the two-sided limit DNE and it's an infinite discontinuity).
(d) At x=1: removable (limit exists, ≠ f(1)). At x=3: jump. At x=4: infinite.
Justification (AP style). "At x = 1, lim_{x→1} f(x) = 4 exists because the left- and right-hand limits are both 4, but f(1) = 2 ≠ 4, so f has a removable discontinuity at x = 1."
0/0 (NO CALC)Problem. Evaluate lim_{x→3} (x² − x − 6)/(x² − 9).
Strategy. Substitution gives 0/0 — indeterminate. Factor both.
Solution. Numerator x² − x − 6 = (x − 3)(x + 2). Denominator x² − 9 = (x − 3)(x + 3). Cancel (x − 3):
lim_{x→3} (x + 2)/(x + 3) = (3 + 2)/(3 + 3) = 5/6
Verify. The cancellation is valid for x ≠ 3, which is all that matters for a limit. Substituting in the simplified form is legal because x + 3 → 6 ≠ 0. Answer: 5/6. (Geometrically, the original function has a removable hole at x = 3 and a vertical asymptote at x = −3.)
Problem. Evaluate lim_{x→∞} (√(4x² + 1))/(3x − 5).
Strategy. Top behaves like √(4x²) = 2|x|. For x→+∞, |x| = x. Divide through by x.
Solution. For x > 0, √(4x² + 1) = √(x²)·√(4 + 1/x²) = x·√(4 + 1/x²). Then
(√(4x² + 1))/(3x − 5) = (x√(4 + 1/x²))/(x(3 − 5/x))
= √(4 + 1/x²)/(3 − 5/x)
As x→∞, 1/x² → 0 and 5/x → 0, giving √4/3 = 2/3. Answer: 2/3 (horizontal asymptote y = 2/3 to the right).
Watch the sign. As x→−∞, √(x²) = |x| = −x, so that same limit would be −2/3. Different asymptote on the left.
Problem. Let f(x) = x³ + x − 1. Show that f has a real root in the interval (0, 1).
Strategy. f is a polynomial → continuous everywhere. Evaluate the endpoints and apply the IVT with k = 0.
Solution & justification. f is a polynomial, so it is continuous on [0, 1]. Compute f(0) = 0 + 0 − 1 = −1 and f(1) = 1 + 1 − 1 = 1. Since f(0) = −1 < 0 < 1 = f(1), the value 0 lies between f(0) and f(1). By the Intermediate Value Theorem, there exists a c in (0, 1) such that f(c) = 0. Therefore f has a real root in (0, 1). ∎
Note the discipline: state continuity on the closed interval, show 0 is strictly between the two endpoint values, then conclude existence on the open interval. Dropping either condition loses points.
"The limit equals the function value." Not always. Students plug in x = c reflexively. That only works when f is continuous there. At holes, jumps, and asymptotes the limit and f(c) can differ — or the limit may not exist at all. Fix: always ask "is this point a break?" before substituting.
Treating 0/0 as if it means the limit is 0 (or DNE). 0/0 is indeterminate — it tells you nothing yet. The limit could be any number, ∞, or DNE. Fix: factor, rationalize, or simplify, then re-evaluate.
Forgetting √(x²) = |x| for limits at −∞. Pulling x out of a square root without the absolute value drops a needed sign flip, turning a −2/3 into 2/3. Fix: for x→−∞, replace √(x²) with −x.
Claiming a limit exists when only one side does. A vertical asymptote where the left side goes +∞ and the right side goes −∞ means the two-sided limit does not exist — you cannot report it as +∞. Fix: check both one-sided limits before declaring a two-sided value.
Botching the IVT conditions. Writing "by IVT there's a root" without stating continuity on [a, b], or applying IVT to a function with a discontinuity in the interval. Fix: every IVT argument names continuity on the closed interval and shows the target value is between the endpoints.
---
## (e) Practice Problems
Mix of [CALC] and [NO CALC], spanning all of Unit 1. Items 13–15 are FRQ-style free-response with required justification. Full solutions in the Answer Key.
lim_{x→2} (x² − 5x + 6)/(x − 2) =lim_{x→0} (sin 3x)/(x) =lim_{x→∞} (5x² − 7x + 2)/(2x² + 3) =lim_{x→∞} (3x + 1)/(√(x² + 4)) =f(x) = (x + 1)/(x² − x − 2), the line x = 2 is a:lim_{x→0} (√(x + 9) − 3)/x =g(x) = (x² − 1)/(x − 1) for x ≠ 1 and g(1) = 3. Which is true at x = 1?lim_{x→0} (1 − cos x)/(x²) = (use that 1 − cos x ≈ x²/2 for small x)h(x) near x = 4: | x | 3.9 | 3.99 | 3.999 | 4.001 | 4.01 | 4.1 | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | h(x) | 6.80 | 6.98 | 6.998 | 7.002 | 7.02 | 7.20 | Based on the table, lim_{x→4} h(x) is approximately:f is continuous at x = c?lim_{x→1⁺} (x)/(x − 1) =f(x) = x³ − 4x + 1 is continuous everywhere. On which interval does the IVT guarantee a root?Piecewise continuity (4 points). Let
⎧ x² + 1, x < 1
f(x) = ⎨ a x + b, 1 ≤ x ≤ 3
⎩ 10 − x, x > 3
(a) Find lim_{x→1⁻} f(x) and lim_{x→3⁺} f(x). (1 pt)
(b) Find the values of a and b that make f continuous on all of ℝ. Show the equations you solve. (2 pts)
(c) With those values, is f continuous at x = 1? Justify using the three-part definition. (1 pt)
Limits and asymptotes (4 points). Let f(x) = (2x² − 8)/(x² − x − 6).
(a) Factor numerator and denominator and identify all x-values where f is undefined. (1 pt)
(b) Classify the discontinuity at each such x (removable or infinite). Justify with a limit. (2 pts)
(c) Find lim_{x→∞} f(x) and state the horizontal asymptote. (1 pt)
IVT application (3 points). A continuous function g has these measured values:
| x | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| g(x) | −3 | 1 | −2 | 5 |
(a) Explain why the IVT guarantees at least two solutions to g(x) = 0 on [0, 6], and state intervals containing them. (2 pts)
(b) Does the IVT guarantee that g(x) = 4 has a solution on [0, 4]? Explain. (1 pt)
---
### Warm-Up (from section a)
(i) For x < 2: (x² − 4)/(x − 2) = ((x−2)(x+2))/(x−2) = x + 2 → 2 + 2 = 4. So lim_{x→2⁻} f(x) = 4.
(ii) For x > 2: (3x² + 1)/(x² − 1); substitute x = 2: (12 + 1)/(4 − 1) = 13/3. So lim_{x→2⁺} f(x) = 13/3 ≈ 4.33.
(iii) 4 ≠ 13/3, so the one-sided limits disagree → lim_{x→2} f(x) does not exist (jump).
(iv) Not continuous at x = 2: the two-sided limit fails to exist (condition 2 fails), independent of f(2) = 5. This is a jump discontinuity.
(v) lim_{x→∞} f(x) uses the x > 2 rule: (3x² + 1)/(x² − 1) → ratio of leading coefficients 3/1 = 3.
### Multiple Choice
1. (B) −1. (x²−5x+6)/(x−2) = ((x−2)(x−3))/(x−2) = x − 3 → 2 − 3 = −1.
- (A) 0: assumes 0/0 = 0. (C) 1: sign slip on x − 3. (D) DNE: thinks 0/0 always fails. The factor-cancel gives x − 3 → −1.
2. (C) 3. (sin 3x)/x = 3·(sin 3x)/(3x) → 3·1 = 3.
- (A) 0: ignores the special limit. (B) 1: forgets the inner factor of 3. (D) 1/3: inverts the factor.
3. (B) 5/2. Degrees equal (both 2); limit = ratio of leading coefficients 5/2.
- (A) 0: rule for n5/3: uses wrong (constant) terms. (D) ∞: rule for n>d.
4. (B) 3. As x→∞, √(x²+4) ≈ x, so (3x+1)/x → 3. More precisely divide by x: (3 + 1/x)/√(1 + 4/x²) → 3/1 = 3.
- (A) 0: misreads degrees (numerator and denominator are both effectively degree 1). (C) 1/2: stray. (D) 3/2: doubles the denominator's effective degree.
5. (C) vertical asymptote. x² − x − 2 = (x−2)(x+1). At x = 2, numerator x+1 = 3 ≠ 0, denominator = 0 → (nonzero)/0 → infinite → vertical asymptote.
- (A) removable: would need a shared factor (x+1 cancels only at x = −1, so x = −1 is the hole). (B)/(D): wrong category.
6. (B) 1/6. Rationalize: ((√(x+9)−3)/x)·((√(x+9)+3)/(√(x+9)+3)) = ((x+9)−9)/(x(√(x+9)+3)) = x/(x(√(x+9)+3)) = 1/(√(x+9)+3) → 1/(3+3) = 1/6.
- (A) 0: assumes 0/0=0. (C) 1/3: forgets to add the second 3. (D) DNE: gives up on 0/0.
7. (B) removable discontinuity. g(x) = ((x−1)(x+1))/(x−1) = x + 1 for x ≠ 1, so lim_{x→1} g(x) = 2, but g(1) = 3 ≠ 2. Limit exists but ≠ f(c) → removable.
- (A) continuous: would need lim = g(1). (C) jump: one-sided limits actually agree. (D) infinite: no asymptote.
8. (B) 1/2. (1 − cos x)/x² → 1/2 (standard limit). Quick check via the hint 1 − cos x ≈ x²/2, so the ratio → (x²/2)/x² = 1/2.
- (A) 0: confuses with (1−cos x)/x → 0. (C) 1: confuses with (sin x)/x. (D) DNE: it exists.
9. (C) 7. Both sides converge to 7 (left values rise toward 7, right values fall toward 7).
- (A) 4: reports the x-value. (B) 6.998: a table entry, not the limit. (D): the table clearly stabilizes.
10. (D). Continuity requires lim_{x→c} f(x) = f(c) — this single equation packs in all three conditions (it presumes both sides exist and are equal).
- (A) and (C) only give existence of the limit; (B) only gives the point. None alone forces equality.
11. (A) +∞. As x→1⁺, numerator → 1 > 0, denominator x − 1 → 0⁺ (positive). Positive/positive-tiny → +∞.
- (B) −∞: that's the x→1⁻ side. (C)/(D): finite values ignore the asymptote.
12. (A) (0, 1). Evaluate: f(0) = 1, f(1) = 1 − 4 + 1 = −2. Sign change + → − ⇒ IVT guarantees a root in (0, 1). Check others: f(−1) = −1 + 4 + 1 = 4 > 0, f(3) = 27 − 12 + 1 = 16 > 0, f(4) = 64 − 16 + 1 = 49 > 0 — no sign change on (−1,0) or (3,4).
- (B), (C): no sign change. (D): IVT requires evaluating the actual endpoints; (−1,1) brackets the same root but isn't the tightest guaranteed and the option's "only" is false.
### FRQ-style Solutions
13. Piecewise continuity (4 pts).
(a) lim_{x→1⁻} f(x) = 1² + 1 = 2. lim_{x→3⁺} f(x) = 10 − 3 = 7. (1 pt)
(b) For continuity at the seams, the middle piece ax + b must match its neighbors:
- At x = 1: a(1) + b = 2 → a + b = 2.
- At x = 3: a(3) + b = 7 → 3a + b = 7.
Subtract: 2a = 5 → a = 5/2. Then b = 2 − 5/2 = −1/2. So a = 5/2, b = −1/2. (2 pts: 1 for correct equations, 1 for correct solve)
(c) Yes, continuous at x = 1. Check the three conditions with f(x) = (5/2)x − 1/2 on [1, 3]:
1. f(1) = 5/2 − 1/2 = 2 is defined.
2. lim_{x→1⁻} f(x) = 2 and lim_{x→1⁺} f(x) = (5/2)(1) − 1/2 = 2, so lim_{x→1} f(x) = 2 exists.
3. lim_{x→1} f(x) = 2 = f(1).
All three hold, so f is continuous at x = 1. (1 pt)
Scoring note: the justification point requires the explicit three-part check, not just "they match."
14. Limits and asymptotes (4 pts).
(a) 2x² − 8 = 2(x² − 4) = 2(x − 2)(x + 2). x² − x − 6 = (x − 3)(x + 2). So
f(x) = (2(x − 2)(x + 2))/((x − 3)(x + 2))
f is undefined where the denominator is 0: x = 3 and x = −2. (1 pt)
(b) At x = −2, the factor (x + 2) cancels:
lim_{x→−2} f(x) = lim_{x→−2} (2(x − 2))/(x − 3) = (2(−4))/(−5) = 8/5. The limit exists and is finite → removable discontinuity (hole) at x = −2.
At x = 3, after canceling, the simplified form is (2(x−2))/(x−3); numerator 2(3−2) = 2 ≠ 0, denominator → 0, so lim_{x→3} f(x) is infinite → vertical asymptote at x = 3. (2 pts: 1 per point, each backed by a limit)
(c) Degrees of original numerator and denominator are both 2; ratio of leading coefficients = 2/1 = 2. So lim_{x→∞} f(x) = 2, and the horizontal asymptote is y = 2. (1 pt)
15. IVT application (3 pts).
(a) g is continuous on [0, 6] (given). Read sign changes:
- g(0) = −3 < 0 and g(2) = 1 > 0: 0 is between them, so by the IVT there is a c₁ in (0, 2) with g(c₁) = 0.
- g(2) = 1 > 0 and g(4) = −2 < 0: again 0 is between them, so by the IVT there is a c₂ in (2, 4) with g(c₂) = 0.
Two distinct intervals (0, 2) and (2, 4) ⇒ at least two solutions to g(x) = 0. (2 pts: 1 per correctly justified interval)
(b) No. On [0, 4], g(0) = −3 and g(4) = −2; the value 4 is not between −3 and −2. The IVT's hypothesis (target value between the endpoint values) is not met, so the IVT does not guarantee a solution. (A solution might still exist — e.g. near the bump at x = 2 where g = 1 — but the IVT alone does not promise one, and in fact g peaking at 1 on the data shown gives no evidence of reaching 4.) (1 pt)
Scoring note: part (b) tests whether students grasp that IVT is a one-directional guarantee — "conditions not met" ≠ "no solution," but it does mean "not guaranteed." Full credit requires citing that 4 is not between g(0) and g(4).
---
CalcIQ · Lesson 5 of 35 · Unit 1: Limits and Continuity · AP Calculus AB Exam Prep
This lesson is independent study material and is not endorsed by or affiliated with the College Board. "AP" and "Advanced Placement" are registered trademarks of the College Board.
Accuracy review: every limit, factorization, and IVT application in this lesson was recomputed independently during generation. Reviewed for mathematical correctness by Isaac (retired actuary). Report any discrepancy for correction.